Wednesday 16 April 2014

Death of a Party



On whether Britpop was the last British music scene...

This year has been designated the 20th anniversary of Britpop, a phenomenon that at the time seemed all-consuming, infiltrating every corner of our cultural consciousness. But my Black Night Crash colleague Adam Bailey poses an interesting question: was Britpop the last true British music scene, and could it or anything on a similar scale ever be repeated?

Firstly, was Britpop even a ‘scene’, or was it simply a genre or type of music? There’s very little in the definitions when it comes to the different shades of popular music. A scene, you feel, should have some geographical element to it, which is not necessary for a genre. Britpop by its name alone has a geographical element to it, and by all accounts much of it did revolve around The Good Mixer pub in Camden, so we are probably safe calling it a scene of sorts. 

The theories behind its success have been well discussed down the years. The most popular is that it was a reaction against the influx of American grunge, which at the time was dominating the guitar music landscape. Grunge itself was seriously strong in ‘scene’ terms, based as it was mainly around one city (Seattle, WA). 

At the time Britain had its own strain of heavily distorted, fuzzy guitar-based scene – shoegaze. While this was going on predominantly in the south, the north also had a vibrant and fairly self-contained scene in the Madchester phenomenon.

So why didn’t either of these catch on and go nationwide (and beyond) in the way that Britpop would a few years later? Madchester’s dancey cross-over element made it commercial enough that a number of the groups under that umbrella enjoyed chart success, though it was very much of its time and so localised (and overtly drug-influenced) that it was unlikely to have much longevity.

As for shoegazing, much as I utterly adore it, the other moniker commonly associated with it – The Scene That Celebrates Itself – tells you all you need to know. Far too introspective and serious to conquer anything beyond its own boundaries, epics of the style such as Ride’s Drive Blind or Slowdive’s Catch The Breeze were never likely to be chart hits in the way Parklife or Common People would be. 

Tellingly, many current bands, including some significant names in America, cite the likes of Ride as major influences. You might not find quite as many who would claim to have been inspired by Menswear. Shoegaze is very much a musicians’ genre.

The clue to Britpop’s success where these others failed again is in the name. It was pop. Stylistically this was a return to the three-minute wonders that the British popular guitar music-loving public have inevitably come back to ever since Merseybeat. 

And it seemed to take over everything in our lives for a year or two. Blur’s involvement with the likes of Damien Hirst, Phil Daniels and Ken Livingstone provided links to the worlds of art, stage, screen and politics, and their battle with Oasis dominating the news ensured that current affairs were covered as well. 

Many are decrying the current anniversary as cynical nostalgia, nothing more than the BBC trying to fill a bit of airtime at a quiet point of year. To that, personally I would say so what? It’s nice to look back. The arguments over when Britpop started and finished (Blur, Pulp, Suede, Radiohead and others were knocking out stuff of a Britpoppish flavour before 1994) and indeed what or who should be included are never likely to be fully resolved. What is not in doubt is that the Britpop ‘thing’ was a major movement. 

And this brings us back to the original question: can anything like that happen on these shores again? Since Britpop there have been other scenes and genres that have achieved reasonable levels of popularity. Britpop’s aftershow party was soundtracked by drum ‘n’ bass as Roni Size and Reprazent won the Mercury Music Prize and drew attention to the Bristol scene. A few years later a large collection of fast and furious guitar pop bands appeared in Sheffield, spearheaded by the now global stars Arctic Monkeys, which with its shared style and location was very definitely a scene.

Why didn’t these become global phenomena? Like Madchester and shoegaze before them, drum ‘n’ bass did not have much commercial appeal, while the Sheffield thing for the most part was too localised, and not stylistically original enough. Where Britpop was heavily influenced by the 60s, and we were ready for that kind of music again, the Sheffield collective were heavily influenced by Britpop and quite simply not enough time had passed.

Where has guitar music got left to go? Is there anything new that people can do with guitars? Everything from 100% unplugged to brain-melting death metal has been covered, with all stops in between. We’ve seen all the cross-over styles you could conceive of working. We have now entered what seems to be a genreless era, where all new bands, as great as many of them are, are simply refinements or tweaks of existing styles, but all off doing their own thing and difficult to categorise. There is nothing especially groundbreaking, and no major movement to speak of.

Britpop itself was of course not particularly original in its musical style; it simply captured a moment. Who knows, maybe in 20 years, something similar will happen with a major revival movement of a similar style. Maybe before that there’ll be a sudden explosion in popularity of metal or folk. 

The way in which we now consume music is also a significant factor. As standardised education and the spread of broadcast media has been credited with eroding differences in language, accent and dialect, the rise of digital music platforms and the Internet has been said to have killed the album, the single and the charts as we knew them. We have such ready access to such an unbelievable wealth of sounds, we would be foolish not to consume as much as possible. 

But this could also mean that the concept of the ‘scene’ has been killed off as well. Physically real communities, scenes and movements will struggle to establish themselves in an age where with the right app on your phone you can listen to local radio stations on the other side of the world if they play the kind of music you like.

The Britpop years were the final few before the Internet took over our lives. This alone, I feel, makes it unlikely that we will see anything on that scale again. For the musician looking to establish themselves this is tricky – being part of a scene or movement can undoubtedly give you a leg up. There are plenty of the Britpop crowd who would never have got signed in another less favourable era.

For the music lover though, there should always be enough people out there producing music in sufficiently different styles to keep everyone happy. We only need to worry that the industry remains strong enough to reward the musicians adequately that they can afford to keep churning out the tunes. It can’t all just be given away free.

Here’s Sleeper…


4 comments:

  1. Interestingly enough I was having a similar conversation with my good lady last weekend while watching the britpop at the BBC thing on BBC4. I didn't quite equate Slowdive or Menswear with Britpop but they kind of get thrown in with everyone else.

    I find it quite interesting trying to work out who was britpop exactly, to my mind only really Oasis of the big 4 didn't have previous work. Blur and Pulp were already well established by 94 and Suede were already over hyped to death. I have friends who put the Manics and Radiohead in with Britpop but they get a slap and told to stop being silly, but what about bands like SFA, Mansun, Gene, Heavy Stereo, they kind of get thrown in but I wouldn't say they were britpop?

    I think back to Oasis at Milton Keynes in the early 00's (The Coral blew them off stage) and when when we went to see the Manics in Manchester, it was full of yobs who thought that singing Wonderwall made them sensitive and that belting out Design for Life at the top of your lungs was all you needed to be a manics fan.. Britpop while fun, was also quite a dangerous place if you were at an Oasis gig and didn't fit the mold.

    Maybe that's musical snobbery on my part (most probably) but you know what, after the 4th rendition of Girls and Boys in one weekend I realized it was actually quite a boring track, a lot of britpop was quite repetitive.

    On the plus side all this nostalgia has made me realize I'd forgotten about a lot of good music and just how much of a crush I had on Louise Werner!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yea completely agree, I had most of those experiences too. I think you've defined pretty perfectly why Britpop was a movement or a scene, and not a genre!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jobi, I think you missed 2 really important points about BritPop and the music scene in general. BritPop worked for me, similarly to Grunge and Nu Metal in that it was also a huge fashion statement (similar to what you said about the 60s). Madchester slightly tapped into this with baggy jeans and novelty t-shirts, which was all self promoting and exactly what a scene needs and exactly what Sheffield and t'Monkeys never had. Liverpudlian music over the years has produced the best bands and songwriters in the UK, though no visual flare. BritPop has a good bunch of video directors and photographers (whom Damon had on speed dial, see the transition from Leisure to Modern Life through to Parklife) who along with the rags, created 'the look'.

    Shoegazing is to me the best genre of the 90s, didn't have a look either, flannel shirts and baggy jumpers was too Seattle like and tagging on the coat-tails of Madchester. The hair was awful too and that would never catch on beyond students with a full head of hair.

    BritPop most importantly had the football crossover. The terrace chant anthems and tweak the lyrics to include a player or team. No Madchester, Shoegazing or Grim Up North songsmiths did this outside of BritPop. Those who did (going against what I just said), jumped the bandwagon and included The Lightning Seeds among them. Oasis and Parklife era Damon were tapped mainline into the footie scene and all hangers on kinda fell into the same boat. Blood is thicker than water and people were more accepting of other bands hanging out with the top 4 bands.

    If Oasis never shouted about Man City or had a football terrace everyman look to them, nor Damon wearing that wardrobe circa 94/95, BritPop would never have happened. There would never have been a look to put on the front page of NME, Melody Maker, Select et al.

    This backs up for me what you said about it being a movement and scene and never a genre. Mansun were never close to Oasis, nor Gene to Blur. Too many bands got slayed thanks to the NME changed scenes quicker than undies, as Birmingham and Ned's, the Poppies and Stuffies fell by the wayside when they could've gone global (well, maybe not Ned's). Same with Shoegazing, some writers there would've bloomed in a Pink Floyd or Genesis way and gone mega concept.

    Football in the last 30 years has been dominant in a scene's success. Oasis, Blur and the Monkeys all had terrace chant tunes and looks and boy did some people latch on to that, whilst others got stapled on, kicking and screaming.

    Also BritPop never had the male pinups of Shoegazing and in a strange way I think BritPop was a safe hetrosexual genre. It mixed bi-sexual with Brett sure (again pre-BritPop), but it was a definite footie team, beers down the pub, "eh up look at the **** on 'er like" mentality at times.

    Madchester - drugs
    Shoegazing - sexuality and individuality
    BritPop - football, beer and gangs

    I may be wrong, I often am!

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, you're absolutely spot on! I didn't want to get too much into defining what it was, rather whether something like it could ever happen again, but all you say is correct. Manic Street Preachers will always be the ultimate definition of all this for me - difficult to lump them in with any of the BritPop bands, although they did get lumped in simply because they were there, and attracting a large following of football lads who completely missed the point of those "anthems". That the boys were big sports nerds themselves probably helped actually!

    ReplyDelete